Welcome to the TeakDoor.com The Thailand Forum. |
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view some discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us
|Battle for Bangkok News 14 Mar: Red-shirts converge on Bangkok, hold first big rally, occupy government district 16 Mar: Protesters splash their own blood at Government House 30 Mar: A round of talks with the government ends in deadlock 3 Apr: Red-shirts occupy Bangkok shopping district 7 Apr: PM Abhisit orders state of emergency 10 Apr: Troops try to clear protesters; 25 people are killed and hundreds injured 22 Apr: Grenade blasts kill one and injure 85 near protest hub; each side blames the other 28 Apr: Policeman shot in clashes in northern Bangkok 13-14 May: 16 killed in Bangkok clashes 15 May: 8 killed in street battles 16 May: More deaths & looting starts 17 May: Seh Daeng pronounced dead 19th May: Battle commences, burning of buildings|
| ||LinkBack||Thread Tools||Search this Thread||Display Modes|
|31-01-2011, 12:41 PM||#1 (permalink)|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Court drops internet lese majeste case
Court drops internet lese majeste case
The court on Monday dismissed the prosecution case against Noppawan Tang-udomsuk, who was accused of insulting the monarchy and violating the Computer Crimes Act.
The prosecution as the plaintiff claimed that on Oct 15, 2008 Ms Noppawan posted messages deemed offensive to the monarchy on www.prachatai.com for public viewing.
However, the court said on Monday the IP address and the telephone number used to connect to the internet to post the message, which was cited as evidence against the defendant, belonged to the mother of the defendant.
Evidence showed that the defendant used the internet after her mother, the court said.
The court said the plaintiff had no witnesses or evidence to prove that the defendant had actually posted the message.
The court said the evidence cited by the prosecution was doubtful, and therefore it gave the defendant the benefit of the doubt and dismissed the case.
"Slavery is the daughter of darkness; an ignorant people is the blind instrument of its own destruction; ambition and intrigue take advantage of the credulity and inexperience of men who have no political, economic or civil knowledge. They mistake pure illusion for reality, license for freedom, treason for patriotism, vengeance for justice."-Simón Bolívar
|02-02-2011, 05:35 PM||#2 (permalink)|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Lèse majesté case against Prachatai poster dropped
The Criminal Court has dropped the case against a woman alleged to have posted offensive messages on the Prachatai webboard in 2008, citing inconclusive evidence, thus giving her the benefit of the doubt.
On 31 Jan, the Criminal Court dismissed the case against Miss A, 28, who was alleged to have used the alias Bento to post messages offensive to the Queen and the Crown Prince on the Prachatai webboard in October 2008, in violation of Section 112 of the Criminal Code and Section 14 of the 2007 Computer Crimes Act.
According to the court ruling, the investigators found that the internet service and telephone number were registered under the name of the defendant’s mother, and were used for her family’s business.
Although the defendant’s notebook computer contained information pertaining to the Prachatai website, no evidence was found to show that the messages had been posted through that computer, the court said.
The court went on to say that the defendant was arrested in a police raid, so she could not have deleted the information. The prosecutor merely checked the IP address with Prachatai and the internet service provider, and this was not sufficient evidence. There was no witness who could confirm that the defendant posted the messages. The defendant’s residence was a factory which had several computers with internet connections, and it was not known which one was used for the posting. Several employees could have used the computers.
The court cited the testimony of a defence witness, an IT expert from Australia, who said that any sophisticated computer user could fake an IP address. Therefore, it was possible that the IP address had been faked.
Unconvinced by the evidence, the court gave the defendant the benefit of the doubt, and dismissed the case.
Miss A was arrested on 30 Jan 2009, and was detained at the Central Women’s Detention Centre for about 10 days before being granted bail. Her alleged offence was also used against Prachatai Director Chiranuch Premchaiporn as the 10th charge against her under Section 15 of the 2007 Computer Crimes Act. Chiranuch’s trial will begin on 4 Feb.
Prachatai has withheld the defendant’s real name at her own strong request.
à¸¢à¸à¸Ÿà¹‰à¸[at]à¸‡à¸„à¸”à¸µà¸«à¸¡à¸´à¹ˆà¸™à¹€à¸šà¸·à¹‰à¸[at]à¸‡à¸ªà¸¹à¸‡ à¸œà¸¹à¹‰à¸–à¸¹à¸à¸à¸¥à¹ˆà¸²à¸§à¸«à¸²à¹‚à¸žà¸ªà¸ •à¹Œà¹ƒà¸™à¹€à¸§à¹‡à¸šà¸šà¸[at]à¸£à¹Œà¸”à¸›à¸£à¸°à¸Šà¸²à¹„à¸— | à¸›à¸£à¸°à¸Šà¸²à¹„à¸— à¸«à¸™à¸±à¸‡à¸ªà¸·à¸[at]à¸žà¸´à¸¡à¸žà¹Œà¸[at]à¸[at]à¸™à¹
|02-02-2011, 06:07 PM||#4 (permalink)|
Have you got any cheese
Join Date: Jan 2006
A proxy I understand, but it would show the IP address of the proxy server.
How can it show the IP address of a private user?
|02-02-2011, 06:43 PM||#5 (permalink)|
Last Online: Yesterday 01:00 PM
Join Date: Sep 2009
It's a bit of a generalisation though.
|02-02-2011, 07:25 PM||#6 (permalink)|
We used to disparage Thailand (carefully) over their leste Majeste laws being a limit on freedom of speech. But now with the silly hate speech crimes and prosecutions in Britain, the rest of Europe and Australia, Thailand actually has more freedom of speech than many of our home countries.
|02-10-2013, 03:55 PM||#7 (permalink)|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Thai woman jailed for 5 years for anti-royal post on website
Oct 02, 2013
BANGKOK (Reuters) - A Thai court jailed a woman for five years on Wednesday for posting online comments insulting to the monarchy, the second ruling of its kind this week under tough lese majeste laws carrying penalties activists say are too harsh.
A judge ruled that Noppawan Tangudomsuk, nicknamed "Bento", posted messages in 2008 on the Web board of news website Prachatai that were deemed offensive to the monarchy, a breach of Thailand's Computer Crimes Act, a controversial law passed by a legislature hand-picked by generals after a 2006 coup.
"Investigations determined the computer's IP address and showed that the messages posted originated from the defendant's computer," said the judge when reading the verdict.
Thailand has some of the world's toughest lese majeste laws, with royal insults punishable by up to 15 years in prison for each offence committed.
|02-10-2013, 04:58 PM||#8 (permalink)|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Court overturns verdict against Prachatai webboard user, sentenced to five-year jail term.
The Appeals Court today overturned a previous verdict and delivered a five-year sentence to Noppawan (lastname witheld), an online user who was charged in October 2008 under the Computer Crimes Act and lèse majesté law, or Article 112 of the Criminal Code, for allegedly posting a defamatory comment against the monarchy on the Prachatai.com webboard.
The user, who went by the nickname "Bento," was detained for ten days in the Womens Correctional Institution after she was arrested in January 2009. She was later acquitted by the Criminal Court in January 2011 because of insufficient evidence.
The Appeals Court has now overturned the verdict after the prosecution attorney filed an appeal in March 2011 stating that the evidence from the police and attorney was credible. The defendant's attorney is now filing for bail using a 700,000 baht guarantee.
On Tuesday, the Appeal Court overturned the verdict against Sondhi Limthongkul, leader of the yellow shirt People's Alliance for Democracy who was prosecuted for lèse majesté and acquitted in July 2012.
Sondhi was charged for recounting the speech of Daranee Charnchoengsilpakul, red-shirt political activist who was given 15-year jail term for lèse majesté, during his rally in July 2008.
The Appeal Court reversed the verdict and sentenced him three years imprisonment, then later reduced to two years. He was granted bail with 500,000 baht guarantee.
|21-10-2015, 06:50 AM||#9 (permalink)|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chiang Mai
Thailand’s Supreme Court Acquits Woman of Lese Majeste, Setting Precedent for Similar Cases
BANGKOK – Thailand’s Supreme Court on Tuesday acquitted Noppawan Tang-udomsuk of lese majeste and computer crime charges in a historic case that will set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
The case is the first ever in which a defendant of such grave charges fought to the end. In other similar cases, defendants have been advised to plead guilty so the penalties are halved.
The Supreme Court also on Tuesday set a precedent with the ruling that “an IP address is no proof the defendant was linked to the offensive post”.
An IP address is a set of numbers assigned to each device in a computer network that uses the internet protocol for communication.
The court also said even some of the plaintiff witnesses questioned the assumption that an IP address could lead back to the identity of an internet user.
Tuesday’s ruling reversed the Appeals Court’s decision that sentenced Ms Noppawan to five years in jail.
Ms Noppawan was accused of writing lese majeste posts on Prachatai.com web-board in 2008, a crime under Section 112 of the Criminal Code and Section 14 of the Computer Crime Act.
Prosecutors filed the charges in April 2009 and the heart of the court battle was whether an identity can be proved by an IP address.
The plaintiff used the IP address and phone connection records as evidence the Bangkok Post Reported.
The defendant insisted she was not the poster, saying her name appeared only as the internet subscriber.
She explained her house also served as a small factory, with several PCs and many people accessing the internet from them.
The court of first instance dismissed the case on Jan 31, 2011. It said there were several PCs at the scene but it was not clear which one had been used to send the post. Several employees at the place had also used the internet under the username and password of the defendant.
Besides, there was no evidence of the post in the PC seized from the defendant and defendant witnesses said IP addresses could be changed easily.
In October 2013, the Appeal Court reversed the ruling, believing a plaintiff witness from a government agency who insisted the IP address of the poster matched that of the defendant’s notebook.
He also claimed changing the IP address and hacking into other computers using the defendant’s IP address was no small feat, especially when one would need a username and password of the defendant when posting the message.
The Appeals Court believed him and sentenced Ms Noppawan to five years in prison.
Prachatai.com closed its webboard in July 2010, shortly after the case.
Thailand?s Supreme Court Acquits Woman of Lese Majeste, Setting Precedent for Similar Cases | Chiang Rai Times English Language Newspaper
|21-10-2015, 06:57 AM||#10 (permalink)|
RUSH HER TODAY
Last Online: 06-01-2017 04:37 AM
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Wat Saul Thisthen
Regardless of the merits of the case the article says the IP of the laptop, surely its the line,number or router that has an address? Perhaps Baldrick or someone clued up can confirm this
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|