Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    13,480

    Pink Floyd Win Court Battle With Emi

    <H1>It's an album not a collection of tracks

    </EM>
    Judge backs Pink Floyd in legal battle to prevent record company selling individual songs on iTunes
    By Cahal Milmo, Chief Reporter


    Friday, 12 March 2010



    When Pink Floyd co-founder Roger Waters took home a copy of the band's latest album, Dark Side of the Moon, to play to his wife early in 1973 and she was so moved that she burst into tears, he concluded: "Wow, this is a pretty complete piece of work."

    Just how "complete" was underlined by a judge sitting in London's High Court yesterday when he ruled that the pioneering recording and the rest of the legendary rock band's albums could not be broken up into their individual tracks and sold separately on internet sites such as iTunes.
    EMI, which signed Pink Floyd in 1967, was ordered to stop allowing their songs to be sold singly online after the court found it was in breach of a contract with the group which forbids the troubled label from selling their records other than as whole albums.


    With albums that often explore a unifying concept and feature tracks recorded together into single-flowing "song suites" Pink Floyd have long been adamant that their work cannot be segmented, and obtained a clause to that effect when they last agreed a new contract with EMI in 1999.
    Pink Floyd's artistic preferences have put them at odds with the digital age, where customers expect to be able to pick and choose individual tracks to download. Digital music now accounts for about 70 per cent of all sales and is worth 2.8bn worldwide.
    In a ruling with far-reaching implications for the right of artists to decide how their work is sold, the judge, Sir Andrew Morritt, found Pink Floyd had a right to "preserve the artistic integrity of the albums", regardless of the format in which they were sold.
    EMI had claimed that the contract, written five years before the launch of iTunes, related only to "physical" records and not online sales. The label admitted it had permitted single-track downloads from epoch-making albums such as The Wall and Wish You Were Here, as well as allowing parts of songs to be used as mobile phone ring tones.
    Sir Andrew ordered EMI, which has debts of 2.6bn and faces the possibility of being broken up if it does not find 120m by June, to pay Pink Floyd's costs of 60,000. A far larger sum could also become payable in new royalties after the band also won a challenge on their share of the revenues from online sales.
    The ruling is part of a wider legal wrangle between Pink Floyd and EMI, meaning that the online sales ban will not become enforceable until the conclusion of proceedings.
    Music industry experts said the row represented a victory for the minority of performers holding out against the "unbundling" of their work for the iTunes generation. Radiohead had taken a similar stance to Pink Floyd but relented in 2008.
    Jon Webster, the chief executive of the Music Managers' Forum, said: "It is an absolute moral right for artists to decide how they want their music sold. But those in the creative field are increasingly challenged by the desire of consumers to break everything from music albums to newspapers into their constituent parts and choose only what they want."


    the independent.


    </H1>

  2. #2
    Mid
    Mid is offline
    Thailand Expat
    Mid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,415
    Well I've always had a deep respect,
    And I mean that most sincere.
    The band is just fantastic,
    that is really what I think.
    Oh by the way, which one's Pink?

    PINK FLOYD - HAVE A CIGAR LYRICS

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    13,480
    ^

    EMI tried to placate Pink Floyd with cigar

    Written by The Red Menace







    Tags: Music


    Saturday, 13 March 2010







    After a court ruled this week that rock band Pink Floyd could stop record label EMI from selling individual songs from its albums, an insider for the music giant was quick to deny that EMI were just a faceless corporation looking to exploit artists.

    According to the inside sources, EMI went to extraordinary lengths to accommodate the wishes of Pink Flood band members Dave Gilmour and Roger Waters.

    The source claims that EMI sent letters to Gilmour and Waters offering them to "Come in here, dear boy, have a cigar.", but that both declined.

    The letter continued "You're gonna go far, you're gonna fly high, you're never gonna die, you're gonna make it, if you try. They're gonna love you."

    While refusing to comment on the exact contents of the letter, a senior EMI executive said "Well I've always had a deep respect, and I mean that most sincere. The band is just fantastic, that is really what I think", adding "Oh by the way, which one's Pink?"

    Both Gilmour and Waters said that a wider issue was at work here, namely the right for artists to retain some form of creative control of their work.

    "With Pink Floyd" said a source close to the band, "you have to look at the music as a whole, not just a series of songs that can be broken up and sold wholesale. Albums like "Dark Side of the Moon" and "The Wall" are works of music, they cannot be disassembled and flogged on iTunes, that would be like cutting up the Mona Lisa and selling off bits on eBay".

    "For far too long record companies have exploited artists as if they were an unending source of revenue, and with the internet they are finding new ways to screw every last ounce out of musicians."

    EMI, however, were reported to unrepentant. Reacting to Gilmour and Waters' wishes for artistic integrity an EMI representative said "And did we tell you the name of the game, boy? We call it Riding the Gravy Train."

  4. #4
    Mid
    Mid is offline
    Thailand Expat
    Mid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,415
    now that is just too funny and no I hadn't seen it prior


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •