Thread: Obama's priorities...let's take a look

^ & ^^ 5555 Nice finds, Cujo.

Originally Posted by cujo

Obama's office did not reply to repeated WND requests for comment

WorldNetDaily [WND} is a for-profit website that provides primarily evangelical-conservative-oriented news and editorials, publishes letters to the editor, maintains forums and conducts a daily poll. Besides providing articles authored by its own staff, the site links to news from other publications.

WorldNetDaily - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



It seems the right wing Blogs have responded to the stimulus provided by the Rovian PR hacks, and are in full pledged panic mode. Both humorous and sad.

Originally Posted by sabang

It seems the right wing Blogs have responded to the stimulus provided by the Rovian PR hacks, and are in full pledged panic mode. Both humorous and sad.

And entirely predictable too, don't forget that one.

^ And their news is probably entirely true, too. Don't forget that one. Rezko...

So Sabang and Ant are voting for Obama.

I'm sure he's thankful. They've lobbied tirelessly.

Originally Posted by Texpat

So Sabang and Ant are voting for Obama.

I'm sure he's thankful. They've lobbied tirelessly.

And once again Tex erects his own, more convenient, windmills to tilt at.

Originally Posted by Texpat

So Sabang and Ant are voting for Obama.

I'm sure he's thankful. They've lobbied tirelessly.

PeeWee is a Kiwi and hence can't vote regardless of how much he'd like to.

March forth! Fight the good and noble fight for liberalization. If your diligent research and hard work can change just one voter's mind ... it'll all be worth it. Just think, you can actually have an impact on the outcome!

Always forward -- to the promised land! And beyond!

Apparently the left believes only they should have a legitimate right to speak out. Anything from the other side of the fence is automatically suspect.

How many people do you see cut 'n pasting from clearly biased left-wing blogs and the like on here then?

There's certainly a propensity for it on here, but it's almost always all from one side of the political spectrum only.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Apparently the left believes only they should have a legitimate right to speak out. Anything from the other side of the fence is automatically suspect.

How many people do you see cut 'n pasting from clearly biased left-wing blogs and the like on here then?

There's certainly a propensity for it on here, but it's almost always all from one side of the political spectrum only.

So you discount those two articles as not being relevant/interesting/truthful?

Originally Posted by cujo

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Apparently the left believes only they should have a legitimate right to speak out. Anything from the other side of the fence is automatically suspect.

How many people do you see cut 'n pasting from clearly biased left-wing blogs and the like on here then?

There's certainly a propensity for it on here, but it's almost always all from one side of the political spectrum only.

So you discount those two articles as not being relevant/interesting/truthful?

That's not what I said. They're certainly relevant insofar as they're on the topic. interesting, well that's a matter of opinion. And truthfulness is likewise a matter of opinion.

What I do know is that if I were making a decision one way or the other blogs are the last source I'd bother looking at. Whatever their political leaning or tendency. There's some complete and utter shite that is promulagated in the blogosphere and any idiot with an internet connection can add his two-cents. Which is fine, problem only comes when people repeat it as fact.

I always think of 'blogs' as one mans opinions.
WND and American spectator could hardly be called blogs.

Originally Posted by cujo

I always think of 'blogs' as one mans opinions.

That's a pretty good definition/way to look at it.

WND and American spectator could hardly be called blogs.

No you're right, fair enough. That being said they could hardly be called non-partisan either.

^^ I'm well aware of the Rezko thing Cujo, and no I don't mind Right Wing Blogs being quoted, although I'm not averse to putting them down either. On this one, they are , unsurprisingly. Obamas association with Rezko was indirect and vague at best- the mainstream media has already been through it with a fine tooth comb.

Theres more mileage in McCains association with some key figures behind the Savings and Loan scandals, such as Charles Keating, actually. But, once again- . Theres enough real issues in this election, without needing to get in a lather about that.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Originally Posted by Texpat

So Sabang and Ant are voting for Obama.

I'm sure he's thankful. They've lobbied tirelessly.

PeeWee is a Kiwi and hence can't vote regardless of how much he'd like to.

A Big "HEH" on that one...heh...

Originally Posted by sabang

^^ I'm well aware of the Rezko thing Cujo, and no I don't mind Right Wing Blogs being quoted, although I'm not averse to putting them down either. On this one, they are , unsurprisingly. Obamas association with Rezko was indirect and vague at best- the mainstream media has already been through it with a fine tooth comb.

You mean the left-wing, hail Obama media, correct? You lefties dismiss as much or more than what you accuse us right-wingers of doing.

^ Now thats a very downbeat tone Jettie. Fox is part of the mainstream media too- dontcha reckon they'd have run with this story? They all would actually if they could smell blood- the media is there to sell content.

The Obama freakazoids have a new symbol...what a crock...



A more fitting symbol of what a typical BO voter looks like:



http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/08/5-universal-gestures-and-symbols-for-obama-supporters/

Just curious booner, has the real Obama been settled on yet? Is he a radical Moslem Mole, a latter day Black Panther, or an effete latte' sipping Liberal?

Originally Posted by sabang

Just curious booner, has the real Obama been settled on yet? Is he a radical Moslem Mole, a latter day Black Panther, or an effete latte' sipping Liberal?

Nothing so complicated as your definitions - just an empty suit is all...

btw...the War Hero always wins...

^ Did BO go to the opening ceremonies in Beijing? 555

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

^ Did BO go to the opening ceremonies in Beijing? 555

Too busy hanging out with unrepentant bombers I suspect...

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

btw...the War Hero always wins...

JFK did. JK didn't.

Originally Posted by Norton

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

btw...the War Hero always wins...

JFK did. JK didn't.

JFK was running against Nixon who was a far cry from being a War Hero.
Adlai Stevenson ran against Ike and who won?