Well, From reading your posts from the time you came to TV and then over here, I would have to say that if you have posted the truth and that is all you have had to do, then yes you do have a pretty dull life.Originally Posted by The Gentleman Scamp

I challenge Starbucks to make a cup of coffee that even comes close to the 20 Baht cup that is served in the coffee shop next to my office.
You're a poor bastard aren't you. Do you ever think that you help keep the people of thailand poor. I would guess you like to feel superior. Buy your cheap coffee but one day when the waiter pulls out a machete and cuts your farang head off remember this, "Life is but a dream".
Last edited by Terry White; 28-01-2008 at 07:23 PM.
If the dollar dips much lower, they're there. Right now they're at 33B with free refill. Hell, the Thais would never leave.![]()

Indeed. The UK hasn't changed a bit since 1982.Originally Posted by Terry White
Did you ever wonder why we drunk tea?
You're right of course. I forced them to make good coffee and sell it cheaply.Originally Posted by Terry White
I presume you're making a bit effort to become TD's resident retard. A fine start - keep it up!

I have posted the truth though not always revealed all and I've had an amazing time - esp with the carnival, and we all know how lucky we are (maybe not the Russians, they took it for granted) - forums have simply filled in the gaps.
Anyway, what does this have to do with coffee and burgers?

Bottom line as always in business my man! $$$$$$$$$$$ Every giant wants to look over the fence to see how to make more $$$. "Cafe Mochas" are addictive and if you make a good cup of "Joe" and sell it for a reasonable price "They will come". We all want somthing good for a fair price so Micky D's wants you in thier shop!
All people have photographic memories, the problem is most people don't have film!
Good for the kunts. Glad to see it. I really don't care for pretentious people.
Chicago Tribune
18 July 2008
Starbucks has spent millions marketing its outrageously expensive and elitist coffee beverages—even pushing those foolish lemon bars on innocent people—and now the company is closing 600 stores.
But all the high priests of the Church of Coffee had to do to prevent the catastrophe was to spend about $3.50 for a used American history book.
There, among the stirring tales of the Alien and Sedition Acts and the Intolerable Acts and the murder of the heroic and much under-appreciated Alexander Hamilton, they would have found the answer to their woes.
Americans started drinking coffee in the first place because tea was so dang expensive, with the English controlling the market and slapping taxes on it, so that a bunch of crazy hooligans from Boston dressed up in war paint and dumped a whole boatload in anger.
Coffee at the time was boiled, then percolated, finally dripped. Cowboys drank it. Rugged explorers pursuing our manifest destiny drank it.
President Theodore Roosevelt drank a gallon of coffee every day before he'd go out to shoot a bunch of creatures and put their heads on his wall. And when he'd sit down with his gallon of coffee, no one would dare tell Roosevelt that he'd just ordered a "venti." He might just put their heads on his wall.
I have a recurring nightmare in which Roosevelt confronts me on Michigan Avenue while I'm holding my favorite, a large mocha Frappuccino. He stares at it, then begins to mock me, louder and louder. My face turns beet red from the shame, and I begin to run on my stumpy bowlegs, with Roosevelt yelling, "Bully! Bully!"
A few years ago, Americans were tricked by marketers into becoming zealots of the Church of Coffee and spending $5 and up for coffee products. But now gas is almost $5. So take your choice: Drive to work or sip your venti.
Americans are in revolt, not by dumping Starbucks baristas into the harbors, but by doing something much more subversive:
Going to Dunkin' Donuts, where they can get a cup of coffee and two doughnuts (make mine jelly) for around $3 and change.
We called Dunkin' Donuts to find out why the company is booming, but executives there didn't have the decency to discuss this phenomenon on the phone. Instead, they sent out a bland corporate statement, which tells me they've got some former Starbucks suits there.
"Our customers . . . are passionate about our coffee and baked goods, because they can get a consistently superior product, served fast, at an affordable price," said the statement from the public relations guy, who said Dunkin' is adding 500 stores.
Later, I walked around Michigan Avenue, confronting people, asking them: If I gave them $5 for breakfast and they had a choice between Dunkin' Donuts and Starbucks, which would they choose?
"Dunkin', " said a woman.
Why?
"Because I get my fix, and I'm full," she said.
That's a lot snappier than the corporate bland-speak from the PR guy. Get your fix, get your fill. All I ask in return is a lifetime supply of Munchkins.
"Pardon me?" asked Mr. Patel, the manager of the Dunkin' Donuts in Countryside.
I explained, like a pilgrim seeking wisdom, that I had journeyed to his store to ask the eternal question. Why is Dunkin' Donuts kicking Starbucks' behind?
"Good coffee, and our doughnuts are nice," said a woman behind the counter. Mr. Patel didn't like that she spoke up.
"I cannot say," Mr. Patel said. "We're not allowed to discuss it. I know the reason. So do you. But it would be better that you speak to the owner. I'm not the owner."
One customer, an overly caffeinated guy who called himself Ziggy—a house painter who claimed he'd been a professor in Europe who'd been blackballed for his Maoist views—insisted that expensive coffee wasn't the problem.
"America is spending too much on bottled water! How many bottles of $1.50 water to the gallon? Do the math! Do the math!" Ziggy insisted, and I pretended to figure it, without knowing the ounces of the hypothetical bottles, nodding and smiling, as would anyone confronted by a madman.
I was saved by a gracious lady, Rosemary O'Brien of La Grange. She's no Starbucksista.
"That other stuff is expensive," she said. "Here, you can have a doughnut. Or two and the paper and coffee—and it won't cost you $5. And that's important, especially today, with things being so expensive."
What about being associated with Starbucks? Isn't there value in having the Starbucks cup in your hand as you proclaim your sensitivity to the environment while driving one of those new green mini-Hummers?
"Oh, so you can walk around with a Starbucks cup? You'll pay extra money for that? How nice. No thanks," Mrs. O'Brien said.
If Barrack Obama had any sense, he'd hire Mrs. O'Brien to be the next secretary of the Treasury. It's about time someone in Washington knows the value of a dollar.
Or, of a cup of coffee.
***
I've said it all along. Dunkin Donuts is much better value -- without the earring.
Fvcking brilliant Tex, sums it all up

Good. Means less people will drink their shit.Originally Posted by Texpat
Starbucks is just a commercial enterprise selling an image to the gullible public. They fall for it every time, as can be seen by the fairly crowded cafes
My own experience is that their coffee is bland and uninteresting. I used to go most days with people from work, had a double shot latte. It was OK, served in a cardboard container for some reason
after a while, I managed to persuade my fellow workers to try another coffee shop. I ordered the same coffee, the double shot latte, 2/3rds the price and ridiculously strong. From then on, I had a single shot latte, at 1/2 the price of the Starbucks nonsense
As for Thai coffee, it can be excellent. I take it back to the Uk and serve it to friends, who love the taste. I get pure Arabica from a local supplier in Chiang Mai, which is also very cheap by comparison.
I have reported your post
I'd prefer a plain Dunkin Donuts coffee to anything Starbucks offers. And I've had most. I don't know if DD Thailand uses the same coffee worldwide. But, as the lady in the story said, I'd have enough money remaining to buy a muffin or a bagel and a newspaper.
I just won't look as cool.![]()
Last edited by Texpat; 20-07-2008 at 02:31 PM.
??? Starbucks does not look cool Tex!
just crappy

I might have something to do with that. I admit I have a problem, I'm a donutaholic.
I used to like Starbucks as it was about the easiest way to get a decent coffee in the UK. McDonalds coffee was terrible, anywhere else was instant crap like Nescafe then you could have a tall creamymoccachinowhippy so it was a no brainer. Over here I brew my own, wouldnt touch Starbucks anymore. Its like the Budweiser of coffee to me now, bland and tasteless.
The Geek Shall Inherit The Earth

McD's new coffee ain't bad. Not as rich tasting as Thai coffee (I continue to agree with Marmite on this point), but cheaper than Starbuck's, whose green tea really sucks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)