the one with the pics on his puter?Originally Posted by NickA
what sort of record did he have?
the one with the pics on his puter?Originally Posted by NickA
what sort of record did he have?

an apparent conviction for a sex offense.
It always used to be that aslong as you have applied for a work permit you can work, even if you know the application may fail, I assume this must have changed?Originally Posted by obsidian

felons get to travel assuming they have fullfilled their sentence, do they not?

It may have changed a few years ago for all I know, but it always was a case of getting the application in and you could work, or maybe they were just more lenient then.

i think the difference is between what is technically legal and the normal day-to-day dodgy practices.
I'd say that a fair amount of circumspect should be exercised in this.
Reporting to the Thai police would be a pretty dangerous thing - what if you were wrong? Perhaps Interpol, or the person's own home Embassy would be a better way to drop an anonymous hint.
Grasses often end up is a spot of bother somewhere down the line - especially if you are wrong!!! Could cost you more than a pretty penny in legal costs & damages.
Personally I think that if the process helps find or deter one pedo from working in Thailand then it will be worth the effort. I am pretty sure this is just the usual blather from the cops but who knows it just may work
Yes, but some of the 'paperwork' included fake degrees.Originally Posted by obsidian
I am not speaking about people whom you just 'suspect' may be doing it, but in the West, teachers, doctors and nurses are obliged by law to report any evidence of child abuse.Originally Posted by watterinja
Why can't teachers here be under the same obligation?

^^ if this is true then i am off point here.
^ it only occurred to the thai powers that be 6 months ago to make domestic violence illegal. this is a primitive place. in a western country i would agree completely but here it is such a cultural circus. caution is an xcellant rule of thumb even when you are completely correct.
I hear you & understand what you're driving at.
'Under law'... what is the Thai law regarding reporting of such matters? How would it be handled? Would a person's dignity & human rights be upheld - even if a suspect? Under Thai law, are you guilty until proven innocent, or innocent until proved guilty? It makes a difference.
Look at John Mark Karr, for instance. The fellow was technically innocent under western law, but as guilty as all hell, under Thai interpretation.
Well, to be fair to the Thais, it did seem he was guilty of something terrible.Originally Posted by watterinja
In Thailand a confession, not matter how it is obtained, says you are guilty.
It was a bit of a different case, though, wasnt it?
Not many people confess to something like that. The Thais would never have heard of that happening.
^ True, fair-enough...![]()
It would seem that if the Thais concentrated on the people who supply the children to these guys, prosecuted and put them in prisons, it would help out a lot with this problem. It,s kind of like only going after the drug user, but never looking at the drug dealers. What kind of police work is that?
Teachers in Thailand have a legal obligation to report suspected abuse, as do doctors, nurses, psychologists, public health officials, local government officials and anybody else in similar positions of responsibility. This is part of the Child Protection Act 2004 which incorporates the UN Declaration on the Rights of Children and legislates against both physical and sexual abuse of children and states that in any such cases involving children the needs of the child are paramount.
Originally Posted by Child Protection Act - Thailand - 2004
http://www.law.yale.edu/rcw/rcw/juri..._Prot_2003.pdf
The Above Post May Contain Strong Language, Flashing Lights, or Violent Scenes.
Well, I am pleased to hear it, but I wonder if they do? The Thai thing of not interfering, may get in the way of it.Originally Posted by DrB0b

I used to work for the CRB back in Blighty... and it is fookin hard for anyone to get any info out of them with out having a set of meetings to decide whether the company who need the info is responsible enough to have it...
So the chances of the boys in brown getting it is........... slim to none
Having lived through the "McCarthy era", I have a strong aversion to lists. Even worse today when the media is clamoring for any sensational headline. Once on a suspect list, not sure how anyone suspected of being a pedophile can ever clear their name even if completely innocent.
They are all too busy posting on forums!Originally Posted by Thormaturge
![]()
The way it works where I come from is that the report is investigated and if it is found to be unsubstantiated, no record is kept.Originally Posted by Norton
Of course this has problems too, in that people can be investigated many times and there is no correalation between the reports.
Not any different really than if a child dies at home (cot death or accident) there is a police investigation into it, no matter what is written on the death certificate.

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)