They are but the bean counters will always look for ways to increase profitability and if that means a move then so be it!Originally Posted by Butterfly
They are but the bean counters will always look for ways to increase profitability and if that means a move then so be it!Originally Posted by Butterfly
The problem is mate, that's an increase of around 35% and they have to factor that into their new manufacturing costs making them a lot more expensive then other companies in neighbouring countries.Originally Posted by buriramboy
Then everyone else will want an increase.
Malaysian and Vietnamese wages (not to mention China and India) are on par or even cheaper wages then Thailand plus the factory running costs are lot less particularly for electricity and fuels.
Minimum wage laws create unemployment and a decrease standards of living. Singapore has no minimum wage laws as far as I know..
The minimum wage laws price companies out of the labor market. If a company can only afford to hire by paying a worker $5 an hour but the govt says you must pay $6, then that company has a negative return on labor. The company will be out of business and that job will not exist.
This is why, in the US, you have to pump your own gas, you dont have people carry your luggage at airports anymore, more automated tellers and clerks ect. The minimum wage laws make automation cheaper then labor. Everyone loses. People with experience and skills or an education (people that are worth more then low wages) have to work harder and enjoy less luxury and the unskilled people cant get jobs because the government makes it illegal for the more productive people to hire them.
Neither does Germany, Italy, Hong Kong (except for foreign workers), Austria, Malaysia, Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden.Originally Posted by socal
he probably can, and the rest he spent on whores and katoysOriginally Posted by buriramboy
![]()
I think the political turmoil of the last five years is the prime cause of that. Also, we are increasingly hearing foreign investors complaining about the lack of skilled labor and decent education & vocational training in Thailand. In that regard, the bumi's & viet's are eating our lunch.Originally Posted by Loy Toy
There are 'minimum wages' and there is 'competitiveness' and they are not the same thing. A hike in minimum wages is required just to maintain historical living standards, given the domestic inflation here. I don't know what PT's specific policy is, but I doubt they would announce a 35% hike in one go- it would likely be phased in over a period of time. In terms of 'competitiveness', minimum or average wages are certainly a part of that, although oft overstated by employers & lobbyists for self serving reasons. I think a considerably more enlightened approach to addressing the competitiveness issue would be to improve the abysmal education standards here, but sadly no party addressed that as part of it's electioneering.
From a 'macro' perspective, the domestic (as opposed to multinational) business lobby has pretty much had it's own way in Thailand. On the one side they benefit from domestic protectionism- many if not most domestic industries here are basically cartels. This means the domestic consumer pays more for a lesser quality product, be that in banking, tobacco, booze, whatever. I can buy Vietnamese cigarettes in nearby Laos for 9bht a packet- and they are considerably better in terms of both packaging and quality than those pushed out via the Thai tobacco monopoly at 45bht a packet and more. Someone is making a lot of money, at the consumers expense.
Protectionism is often justified because it 'enables' companies to pay their local labor at decent rates, but this is manifestly not the case in Thailand. So domestic business benefits both ways- protectionism enabling them to keep their prices & profitability high, their quality & re-investment low. Low wages also help keep their costs low, and of course further enhance profitability. Plus of course the legions of foreign workers in Thailand from Laos, Cambo & Burma- who, more often than not, are being employed illegally. Someone is being rewarded to studiously look in the other direction, but of course this top level collusion is very much a part of the Thai way of doing things- and it is expressly for the benefit of a Few.
The third leg of the pyramid is tax collection & revenue, which at 17% of GDP is very low in Thailand by any international standards. It is obvious who this benefits- just look at the obscene wealth differentials here, and even they are understated.
So really, if we are to focus on a competitive future vision for Thailand, minimum wages are a small part of the equation. Education, tax collection, and a systematic lowering of punitive tariffs and other barriers to competition are considerably more critical, and of course a relatively stable, sustainable political system- which (perhaps) we are getting towards now.
Last edited by sabang; 05-07-2011 at 03:51 AM.
''The party plans to cut corporate income tax to 23 per cent from 30 per cent in its first year in office, then to 20 per cent in later years.''
they can pay the extra wages out of that .
min wage good idea ,better than a race to the bottom with other countries towards starvation wages,
and they could add big fines for anyone employing cheaper immigrants
I hope PT will try to resolve the wealth disparity in this country,
time to tax the rich, land and condos
the 35% hike in one go would actually be justified, well overdue

The PADyellows have always been against redistributing wealth, and allowing votes to the "peasants"
They have been supported by many falang nutters off here in their quest.
I would like to see the coalition tax the very same falang nutters till the pips squeekand give it to those same "peasants"
An immediate rise to 300 baht a day was their election policy. Interestingly, not with different rates per province. That alone could cause some interesting realignments of the workforce.Originally Posted by sabang
The present number is about 7500 which is too much as graduates have no experience, and disgusting sence of entitlement and not a lot between the ears.Originally Posted by StrontiumDog
The whole artical is a disaster.
Thaksins mention of putting the baht at 40 to the U$D would keep farangs who can only think in terms of how many beers they get from their pensions hazppy but at 40 to the dollar diesel would be about 40 baht per litre which which would cause Thailands economy to detonate in a way not seen since 1997.
Great start guys![]()
Last edited by Spin; 05-07-2011 at 08:05 AM.
funny that Thaksin was saying 40 to the THB when he was advocating the THB to go to 20 only a few years ago
the dude can't make up his mind![]()
better idea, kick out the farang keenok like yourself who are on a 30,000 THB monthly budget and don't contribute anything to the country materiallyOriginally Posted by LooseBowels

Raising the minimum wage knocks up the salary structure across the board up to middle management- if your manager is making ~12K and your lower-end workers are making ~6K, then bumping the lower end to 8K-9K means you'll have to give your manager a commensurate bump in salary to merit his higher position and work responsibilities- it's not just about the lowest-paid people on staff.
This could potentially cost employers quite a bit.
There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
HST
Thai-ASEAN News Network
New Govt Urged to Gradually Adjust Minimum Wage
UPDATE : 5 July 2011
The private sector asks the new government to gradually adjust the daily minimum wage and ensure that the hike is in line with productivity.
Federation of Thai Industries Chairman Payungsak Chartsutthiphol commented on the Pheu Thai Party's campaign promise to raise the daily minimum wage.
He said that if the new government is to increase the wage, it should be done gradually to minimize the effects on businesses.
He said the new government should also allow manufacturers time to adjust to the higher minimum wage.
The rise in the daily minimum wage means higher cost of production for business owners.
Payungsak called on the new government to lay down measures to assist and strengthen Thai industries.
The federation chairman believes the Thai economy would grow by four to five percent this year.
Thai Chamber of Commerce Chairman Dusit Nontanakorn said despite her lack of political experience, the private sector is ready to give Pheu Thai top party-list MP Yingluck Shinawatra an opportunity to prove herself once she becomes prime minister.
Dusit noted that the new government's policies should be based upon reality, adding the increase in minimum wage should be done simultaneously with development of workers' skills.
President of the Thai Labor Solidarity Committee, Chalee Loysoong, said most members of the public voted for the Pheu Thai Party as they expected promises made in the party's campaign to be kept.
If the party fails to deliver on the promises, it will come under pressure from the public.
He suggested Pheu Thai vet its plan to raise the minimum wage to 300 baht a day during a parliamentary session with inputs from its coalition members.
"Slavery is the daughter of darkness; an ignorant people is the blind instrument of its own destruction; ambition and intrigue take advantage of the credulity and inexperience of men who have no political, economic or civil knowledge. They mistake pure illusion for reality, license for freedom, treason for patriotism, vengeance for justice."-Simón Bolívar
How do they increase the minimum wage for farmers for example because the Rice Middle men habitually fuck them over.......
Bangkok Post : Labour demands quick wage rise
Labour demands quick wage rise.
A labour network has urged the Pheu Thai Party to honour its promise to raise the minimum wage to 300 baht per day as soon as possible, and demands that the new labour minister be a person who understands and respects the workers.
- Published: 5/07/2011 at 05:06 PM
- Online news:
Chalee Loisung, chair of the Thai Labour Solidarity Committee, said Tuesday that the Pheu Thai Party should raise the minimum wage to 300 baht per day immediately after it takes government, to honour the promise it made during its election campaign.
"The Pheu Thai Party told voters that it would raise the minimum wage to 300 baht right away, so it should honour its word.
"Although the authority to increase the wage rests with the wage committee, the spoken promise commits it," Mr Chalee said.
He also demanded the new government ratify the convention of the International Labour Organisation on the right to organise and collective bargaining, amend the law to facilitate the establishment of labour unions and protect founding members of labour unions from being laid off, and make the Social Security Office an independent organisation.
Mr Chalee was heartened by speculation that Jarupong Ruangsuwan, former permanent secretary of the Labour Ministry would be the new labour minister.
He said Mr Jarupong knows workers' problems and is open to discussions.
Some former ministers did not understand workers' problems, which were real, and even looked down on workers, he said.
^ Pressure is mounting before they've even taken office...

Does anyone know the details of the 300 THB policy?
According to the missus the whole thing is a cunning marketing ploy where they spray the board the '300 THB FOR ALL' whilst hiding the fine print.
The fine print is it only applies to skilled labour. Factory jobs etc. would not qualify, though experience also plays a part in qualifying. Also, there are tax breaks for businesses affacted by the new policy.
That's jusxst what the mrs says, anyone else hear that?
For Thais Populist Policies Could Harm Thailand Economy - WSJ.com
New Populist Policies Could Harm Thai Economy
By LEIGH MURRAY
BANGKOK—A sweeping electoral victory for Yingluck Shinawatra has allowed Thailand to avoid the immediate risk of social unrest or military intervention, but the incoming government's populist policies may threaten the vibrancy of Southeast Asia's second-largest economy.
The sister of exiled former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra wooed voters not only with her charisma, but with an array of vote-grabbing promises: an increase of 36%-89% in the minimum wage, guaranteed rice prices for farmers, starting salaries of at least 15,000 baht ($492) for university graduates, tablet PCs for students, and high-speed trains across the country.
"Even if they only deliver a fraction of what they promise (on wages), the impact will be significant" on inflation, said Santitarn Sathirathai, an economist with Credit Suisse in Singapore.
A few days before the election—with both parties promising to raise the minimum wage—Mr. Santitarn raised his average inflation target for 2012 to 3.7% from 3.5%.
The way the government implements any minimum-wage increase will be crucial: An across-the-board increase "will be very inflationary," Mr. Santitarn said, but a varied introduction across sectors would limit the impact on inflation, which rose 4.06% in June from a year earlier.
The Bank of Thailand has warned that inflation poses the biggest threat to economic growth this year. Gov. Prasarn Trairatvorakul said during the election campaign that the next government needs to maintain fiscal discipline and that increasing the budget deficit could threaten fiscal stability.
Standard Chartered Bank wrote in a research note that the For Thais party had indicated its economic policies would cost around 1.85 trillion baht over the next five years, a level of spending that could push back plans to achieve a balanced budget by two years, to fiscal 2018.
Although Thailand's public debt of about 45% of GDP "is not yet at alarming levels, the big-ticket investment could imply larger demand for public borrowing over the coming years than markets had expected," Standard Chartered said.
Despite the calls for fiscal discipline, the new government will face enormous pressure to make good on its promises. Members of Thailand's vast rural population, many of whom are low-income earners, were critical in lifting For Thais to power.
Among the big winners will be rice farmers, who have been promised 15,000 baht per ton of rice from the government—prices are currently below 10,000 baht/ton—a policy analysts say could lead to hoarding. Because Thailand is one of the world's biggest rice exporters, it also could trigger a dramatic increase in global prices.
Not everyone sees a threat, however. Frederic Neumann, co-head of Asian economics at HSBC, believes big-spending policies won't undermine Thailand's competitiveness against its regional peers since minimum wages in China "are rising a lot faster."
He adds that Thailand's fiscal position remains healthy enough that it could allow its budget deficit, targeted at 420 billion baht this fiscal year, or some 3.9% of GDP, to widen.
The trouble is not with short-term funding, Mr. Neumann said, "but if you make commitments indefinitely, then it becomes hard to reverse these at some point."
This would be economic growth that have only benefited a few at the high end of the export chain. I can see how most Thais couldn't give a shit about growth where a great majority have gone backwards rather then benefited. The Bank of Thailand's foreign reserves have done very nicely and it is time to use some of that excess for the benefit of the country.....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)