View Single Post
Old 19-04-2009, 02:43 AM   #47 (permalink)
EmperorTud
សុខសប្បាយ
 
EmperorTud's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 10:35 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge
Posts: 6,478
EmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand ExpatEmperorTud Thailand Expat
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
what - because I question yours and tuds campaign to paint this present govt as the evil overlords ?
What campaign?

I am just pointing out that Thaksin wasn't the devil as many posters, such as bones earlier, try to make out. Bones also made a statement based on nothing more than his opinion that was utterly false to try and further his position. I corrected him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
though his statistics do not seem to acknowledge that an upsurge in internet usage and increasing tubulent society might have also increased the amount of radical posting online
Are postings criticising the establishment radical?

Or are they warranted, as I believe, because the rural majority have been diddled out of their vote by the old establishment?

Seems to me that this campaign of censorship is to protect the coup-makers and those who continuously interfere in politics and hinder the democratic process.

The statistics on website censorship show an increase of 443% in censorship during the 3 months following the 2006 coup, so an upsurge in internet usage or "turbulent society" certainly isn't the reason.

But again, why should people be prevented from criticising or discussing the coup and the CNS Junta on the internet?

No-one should be immune from criticism or debate, least of all the military.
__________________
Mortals you defy the Gods, I sentence you to travel among unknown stars, until you find the Kingdom of Hades, your bodies will stay as lifeless as stone.
EmperorTud is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13825 seconds with 16 queries